Oedipus Innocent Essay

In Sophocles catastrophe, Oedipus unrelentingly pursues the truth of his consume ancestry and actions in the past, ma nance this play a tragedy of action in which, in the end, the king goes into exile, believing that he has killed his own beget and had incest with his own mother. While this latter purpose is not debatable, it is questionable whether or not Oedipus killed his flummox, and he could be innocent. each(prenominal) the cogent evidence is that he killed his induce is from the seer and seer Tiresias.his fears and suspicions and discover the truth, which is his fate, he is doomed in doing so. To his mother son and husband both, he sowed the loins his father sowed, he spilled his fathers blood Go in and reflect on that, solve that, and if you note Ive lied from this day off call the prophet blind (Sophocles). All Oedipus knows is that he killed a man at a crossroads there was no direct communication between them, and no recognition.One would think that Oedipus, how ever metaphorically blind he may be at this point, still has eyes lavish to recognize his own father. His own obsessional seeking of the truth could also domiciliate to the fallacious assumption that Oedipus makes, without certainty, that he has thence killed his own father. In pursuing the answers to his own tragedy obsessively, Oedipus becomes a sympathetic cipher who is blind to the possible truth, and accepts that he has killed his father without having overwhelming proof.There is still a reasonable precariousness that the person at the crossroads could have been a empty stranger. But Oedipus will demands that he exercise his essential nature to fight against destiny, and this makes him clean blind to the facts. There is no proof beyond the shadow of a doubt that Oedipus has really killed his own father. It is simply what Oedipus believes. Sophocles (2005). Oedipus the King. Norton Anthology of Literature. sensitive York Norton.